
Over the last few weeks I have been reading books which have centred on theology and religion, perhaps causing the very few constant readers of this website to worry if I have gone over to the dark side. They need not fear, especially as I have balanced such reading with two texts that sit at the opposite end of the spectrum. The first of which is philosopher Julian Baggini’s excellent text for OUP’s ‘A Very Short Introduction’ series on Atheism. I chose to read this book as a precursor to Richard Dawkin’s controversial text, The God Delusion (2006), a book I have started twice but had to put down as I was unable to commit the time to reading it. Knowing Dawkin’s penchant for being hot-headed, a little arrogant, and inflexible, I thought it would be a good idea to temper his book with something a little more considered, balanced, and which puts the case for atheism rather than being a book against religion – a very important distinction in the case of these two texts.
Why might you ask should I read such books at all? Well, it is one thing to say that you are an atheist and do not believe in god – which may be a conviction borne from gut feeling rather than intellectual consideration – but I think it helps to be able to rationally explain to anyone who asks why you take that position and also have the arguments at your fingertips. This is where Baggini’s book is most useful, because it weighs up all the theological arguments whilst being grounded in the best philosophical, scientific, and rational thinking. Taking in everyone from Freud to Kierkegaard, Plato to Dostoevsky, Bertrand Russell to Richard Dawkins himself, Baggini puts the case for atheism as a positive belief system which is not defined by its absence (i.e. no god) but rather as a way of describing the world about us and a means of living a fulfilling and morally good life. His writing is assured, balanced, learned, and very persuasive and is an essential read not only for atheists but for believers who wish to firm up on positions other than their own.
As with most of the introductory texts in this series, it summarises all current thinking on the subject but it is also an excellent jumping off point into other texts which might interest the reader, and indeed Baggini provides an essential list of ‘references and further reading’ for those who wish to find out more. For me, this text helped articulate specific points about atheism which I knew intuitively but which I perhaps could not quite articulate myself. Baggini argues the case that atheism, rather than being in opposition to theism, is actually grounded in rationalism and naturalism which is traced back to the ancient Greeks. It is a way of describing the natural (not supernatural) world in which we live in rational, scientific terms without the need to countenance the idea of a man made god or the solaces of organised religion. He states brilliantly why it is possible to have good, meaningful lives without needing the church to instruct on goodness or meaning. He also argues for a secular society, not an anti-religious one, which perhaps marks it in direct opposite to Richard Dawkin’s The God Delusion, something I think is crucial.
Whatever your belief or stance, it is important to ask oneself questions from time to time about who they are and why they believe the things they do. There are far greater thinkers in history who can frame the things we only feel into brilliantly worded discourses which fully describe those feelings. Baggini’s Atheism is an excellent place to start before engaging in those texts which take perhaps a more inflammatory, controversial approach.
Official Website of OUP: A Very Short Introduction